Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
June 3, 2013
Image Size
5.2 MB
Resolution
2491×1701
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
8,681
Favourites
30 (who?)
Comments
10
Downloads
38
×
LADIES SPANKING CLUB 1950 by ArtBoy62 LADIES SPANKING CLUB 1950 by ArtBoy62
A mid Century chapter in the history of the ladies private spanking club...

Nylon stockings and suspenders were in, as were semi transparent nylon knickers in lurid colours.

Of course the knickers were left at half mast when their governess wanted to discipline her supplicants bare bottomed...

It was all part of the ritual, all part of the painful pleasures enthusiastically administered...

and gladly received by those naughty 50s ladies.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconfrancescd:
There actually is such a club in NYC. Mostly professional woman,
Reply
Hidden by Owner
:iconnuyoknuyok:
Wonderful drawing. Everybody seems so committed to the task at hand, malgré the worried look of the lady in the yellow bloomers.

Did ladies spanking clubs really exist, or is it just a figment of your imagination ? I find it a very erotic idea, those ladies getting together for the sole purpose of giving and receiving spankings, in an all female environment.
Reply
:iconartboy62:
Thank you for your kind remarks.

With all due respect, you seem totally innocent in regards fetish clubs. There have been private spanking clubs for ladies and men since the 17th Century.
Women are as much into erotic spanking as men...

however, being women they are better at hiding their sexual proclivities and appearing perfectly normal and wholesome.
Reply
:iconnuyoknuyok:
It's good to hear that I still can be considered innocent, and I'm sure I am, in some respects.
I wonder who were the ladies that attended these all-women clubs in the repressed society of the 50s. Were they all independent and perhaps lesbians ? Because if they were married it would have been difficult to hide the marks from their husbands when they were in the receiving end.
Reply
:iconartboy62:
The 1950s were sexually repressed for the masses, still conditioned by militarist propaganda and sexist double standards.

However, liberated women knew instinctively that socio-sexual rules were not for them. They'd tasted freedom in arms factories and other war time industries. Some women preferred the company of their own sex and not necessarily because they were raving lesbians...

Spanking is a law unto itself, a man can wear frilly knickers for his spanking and not necessarily be a transvestite... He can enjoy being spanked by a man and not necessarily be homosexual...

It's the spanking that's the turn on... A same sex spanker, the underwear frippery... It's simply the cream on the top.

The same is true of a woman... Most women who prefer female mistresses or governesses are not necessarily homosexual. They simply want the dom. / sub. experience without the heavy male-female mind games.

Hope that clarifies a few spanking fetish issues.
Reply
:iconnuyoknuyok:
It's an interesting point that some women would rather choose to be spanked by other women in order to avoid the male/female mind games. That makes sense. Upper or upper-middle class games for independently wealthy, or "independent" women. The repressed masses spanked their women in the bedroom, without any frills.

A bit aside, I wonder why in artistic depictions of a FF scene the younger woman is almost always portrayed as the spankee. I'm referring to real life situations, in which the fetishist element is more or less concealed, and the spanking is given under the guise of chastisement, the sub's consent being in the best of cases reluctant, or plainly absent (lady of the house/maid, sister/sister, etc) It is not at all psychologically impossible for a younger woman to have the upper hand in any life situation over an older lady. I know of a lady in her forties who was given a serious spanking by a much younger girl, with whose boyfriend the older one was having an affair. Whoever holds the moral ground can discipline, or chastise, the other one is at fault and can be punished. It is not always a question of age.
Reply
:iconartboy62:
The reason older women are invariably chosen as doms. and younger women as subs. is self evident to me. Even if a woman is in her 30s or older, she normally seeks out a mother, teacher, governess, school mistress figure to do the honours.

To reverse traditional roles is not really in the classic domestic discipline mould.

I don't think I'd ever have a young woman... (daughter figure) chastising an older woman... (mother figure.) in a drawing or painting.

To me and most traditional spanking aficionados... It would be like the supper baddie shooting the cigar smoking hero with no name at the end of a spaghetti western.
Reply
:iconnuyoknuyok:
So that's the reason why I've seen only a few of those. It's a pity that the conventions of the genre don't allow it, since it does happen in real life -evidently not as often-, and it adds a strong element of humiliation, since the one being humbled is the symbolic figure of authority.

One other reason might be that this convention allows the display of a young woman's body, a more attractive erotic object. The maid chastised is always young, although it is known that servants had been punished for centuries with complete disregard for their age, or sex for that matter. And when role reversal is depicted, both the maid and the lady of the house are young, and beautiful.

Oh well, I guess conventions are conventions. There are conventions even for transgressing.
Reply
:iconartboy62:
I saw a series of shots in a vintage 1950s school magazine once...

It was a classic role reversal thing...

50s kids spanking their parents... or should I say, pretending to by the amused expressions on the parent's faces.

They were meant as pure comedy and could not have been interpreted as anything else...

Problem is... this kind of role reversal is always faintly ridiculous, as it does not reflect reality at all.
Reply
Add a Comment: